Seeking answers to our failure to

reduce fossil fuel emissions

We are a group of climate activists who are growing increasingly skeptical about the effectiveness and future prospects of the "100% Renewables" approach to solving climate change. Here are some of our concerns and questions. We welcome you to share your concerns and submit any additional information you have about these issues.

Learn More

Why This Matters

We are in a climate crisis! We need to transform our global energy systems to eliminate carbon emissions at unprecedented speed. Climate leaders must do what it takes to help solve this problem. Fortunately, the Biden Administration has stepped up. But that isn't the case with environmental non-profits. These groups are stuck. Their anachronistic, knee-jerk opposition to nuclear power—our largest source of carbon-free energy—is holding back progress and a bipartisan approach to solving climate change. The reason: self-interest. They know we need nuclear power but they are afraid of losing donor support.


Ironically, mainstream environmental groups do not prioritize solving the climate crisis by eliminating emissions. They prioritize their own survival. They have taken their eye off the goal—eliminating fossil fuel emissions yet still providing humanity with the energy we need—and are reduced to promoting a particular "means" to that goal, namely renewables. They cannot approach this highly wicked, potentially catastrophic problem with an open mind and an "all hands on deck" mindset because of their fear of backlash from supporters who they've long conditioned to fear nuclear power. Thus, they are now part of the problem.

These enviornmental leaders are hypocrites: they are well aware that renewables are not sufficient. That some "renewables" are not even all carbon-free. But they are compromised by their own fear of losing their prominence, relevance and support. They are worried for their own reputations and believe they risk losing credibility as leaders. Too many of these old-fashioned environmentalists won't even look at the scientific data. To them, accepting the use of nuclear power is anathema to their own self-perception. So they band together and reject any effort to have their opinion shifted, despite knowing that we are at risk of missing our emissions reduction targets. Their true priorities are self-preservation more than actually helping to reduce emissions. Plus, because fossil fuels have allied with those supporting renewables, they further risk alienating their biggest corporate donors—fossil fuel interests.

 

Even though the BIden Administration, climate scientists, energy experts and most all international bodies are all supporting an "all of the above" and nuclear-inclusive approach to addressing climate, the following individuals and environmental non-profits are holding out for the failed "Renewables Only," approach. We are calling them out and showing how unrealistic, hypocritical and irresponsible their position is—especially to future generations. Learn more by reviewing our blog on the Trouble with Renewables.


Index of Issues with Renewables

Screenshot 2023-09-01 at 9.20.43 AM

Low Capacity Factors

Solar and wind operate intermittently. They go on and off both predicably (i.e. every sundown) and unpredicably (with clouds or wind). Averaging 15% and 35% capacity factors are lowest of any tech.

Screenshot 2023-09-01 at 9.20.55 AM

Under-Stated Costs

Proponents are prone to claiming that renewables are cheaper than coal. But the true costs of adding renewables to the grid requires accounting for the added costs they impose on the energy system.

Screenshot 2023-09-01 at 9.21.07 AM

Unrealistic Assumptions

Mark Z. Jacobson has presented arguments that assert that we can power the world with just renewables. Sadly, these estimates are based on entirely unrealistic assumptions.

Screenshot 2023-09-01 at 9.21.20 AM

Severe Ecologic Impacts

The "green" aesthetics of images of renewables belie the large ecologic impacts that they impose on land, air and biological life. Wind power is wiping out many bird and bat species.

Screenshot 2023-09-01 at 9.25.19 AM

Vulnerable to Weather

Those touting wind and solar as the only solution needed, never address the issue of how extreme weather will impact those technologies which are wholely exposed to and dependent on the weather.

Screenshot 2023-09-01 at 9.25.43 AM

Wildly & Widely Unpopular

Opposition to wind and solar is growing from communities that find them nuisances and eye-sores. Proponents don't like to acknowledge that, in fact, these "green" technologies are unpopular.

Screenshot 2023-09-01 at 9.26.01 AM

Growing Production Costs

Production costs of solar and wind have declined considerably over the last decade but costs are rising again. Some of the decline was due to low cost fossil fuels and record low interest rates.

Screenshot 2023-09-01 at 9.26.16 AM

No Industrial Solutions

It is convenient for those pushing renewables to discuss their role on the electric grid because, in fact, these technologies don't provide viable economic solutions for industrial energy users.

Screenshot 2023-09-01 at 9.26.32 AM

Conflicted Advocates

Why are renewable proponents allied with fossil fuels? Why do those pushing the renewables-only approach act like bullies and refuse to engage in discussion of alternative approaches?

Screenshot 2023-09-01 at 9.26.48 AM

Siting & Permitting Delays

Production costs of solar and wind have declined considerably over the last decade but costs are rising again. Some of the decline was due to low cost fossil fuels and record low interest rates.

Screenshot 2023-09-01 at 9.27.01 AM

Ideologic & Partisan

For there to be real progress against fossil fuel emissions, we need to bring together broader coalitions in support of pragmatic solutions, yet renewables' ideologic leaders refuse to collaborate.

Screenshot 2023-09-01 at 9.27.20 AM

Other Issues

Other types of issues that don't fit neatly into other categories which explain why those advocating for renewables are causing us to fail to adequately solve the climate crisis

How the largest economies decarbonized

Most Decarbonized Countries

Let the Numbers Speak

1x
Renewables Growth over the Last Decade
1+
Countries Committed to Clean Energy
$1+
Billions Spent on Renewables Globally
1+
ppm CO2 in Atmosphere (and still growing!)

What they're saying

To solve the climate problem, policy must be based on facts and not prejudice. Alongside renewables, Nuclear will make the difference between the world missing crucial climate targets or achieving them. [The Guardian]

Dr. James Hansen
Dr. James Hansen Former NASA Climate
Scientist

The whole world has to lean into getting to net zero and addressing climate change. Nuclear is such a clear part of that. . . . Everywhere people are looking to us to help them reach their goals with nuclear. [Journal Record]

Screenshot 2023-09-04 at 11.55.02 AM
Jennifer Granholm Secretary of Energy,
US Department of Energy

Dear Greenpeace,
It's a climate emergency! Drop your old-fashioned and unscientific opposition to nuclear power, and join us in the fight against fossil fuels instead. [RePlanet Petition]

Screenshot 2023-09-04 at 12.03.30 PM
Ia Aanstoot, Age 18 Youth Climate Activist
petitioning Greenpeace